Skip to Navigation | Skip to Content

ConstitutionMaking.ORG: Resources for Constitutional Design

Main Navigation

Receive email updates of our blog.

3.29.2010

QUEBEC AND RELIGION

Legislation has been introduced in Quebec to ban women from covering their faces when seeking or providing provincial services. This would effectively prevent Muslim women needing such services from wearing the niquab, a veil that covers the face. Supporters argue this promotes gender equality and more open interactions between the province’s citizens. Even national liberal party leader Michael Ignatieff (a former Harvard professor) has indicated his general support. Opponents argue this would take away the choice of these women and infringes on their religious freedom. Newspaper articles regarding the issue suggest widespread support in Quebec. There have been several situations already where government related entities in Quebec have refused to provide services. Ironically, one of them involved a woman who was denied the chance to take a French language course. Thus, some supporters have argued the bill would simply clarify existing practices. Whatever one’s position, this proposal seems at odds with a Canadian constitutional theme that the nation takes a "mosaic" approach to diversity, unlike the U.S. "melting pot."

On another Quebec religion topic, I recently learned, from a student and from other sources, that some profanity in Quebec uses Catholic terminology in a derogatory way. This is certainly different from the U.S where most profanity has a connection to sexuality. The veil and the profanity issue both suggest some general skepticism about religion in Quebec, to say the least.

3 comments:

  1. Re Quebecois profanity: I remember learning about this in French class in high school (in Toronto). There is, of course, a Wikipedia page on it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quebec_French_profanity

    Can you clarify what you mean when you say this kind of profanity "suggest[s] some general skepticism about religion in Quebec"? Do you mean it suggests that people in Quebec are skeptical about religion? Or that we should be skeptical about the depth of people's religious commitment in Quebec? I think both conclusions would be wrong. Profanity gets its force from being profane. What is not sacred cannot be profaned. I'm oversimplifying for the sake of a nice verbal formula, of course, but you get the general idea.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Isn't it more likely that Quebecois swearing patterns date back to the era of the all-powerful Catholic Church there, so the swearing might be more a response to taboos than skepticism about religion.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete

Copyright 2011 Constitution Making. All rights reserved.

XHTML | CSS | Section 508